BE DiFFERENT or be dead Blog by Roy Osing
FOLLOW ROY OSING ON TWITTER
SUBSCRIBE TO ROY’S BLOG
Excellent post! So often, leaders confuse walking around the office with actually engaging with and serving their employees. Saying “hello” is not the same as a “serving moment”.
I love LBSA. It describes an aspect of leadership that is critical to employee growth. By uncovering the needs of employees and removing barriers to peak performance, the leader is demonstrating empathy. Through this behavior employees are sure to reach their potential. Personally, it would motivate me to strive to exceed expectations.
Excellent post. Thanks for sharing this fantastic approach to leadership.—Jen Kuhn, The Experience Factor
March 29, 2010
Better, Best vs. DiFFERENT
Look around at the competitive claims being made these days, and most of them will look something like:
- ‘We offer the best network’
- ‘Our customer service is better than our competition’
These types of claims don’t cut it:
- they are aspirational statements that don’t provide any meaningful guidance to people in the organization in terms of what they should do and how they should behave to ‘live’ the strategy.
- they don’t give customers any meaningful information that helps them understand the competitive claim. For example the largest Telecom Company in Canada claims to have the ‘best network’ among their competitors. Is this useful information to a customer? Does it explain the characteristic of their network that makes it the best?
- they are difficult if not impossible to prove particularly in terms that address customer needs. In my experience, claims of this nature attract internal organizational statistics to ‘prove’ the claim and not specific attributes that are compelling to customers. They talk to the internal audience rather than the external one.
BE DiFFERENT competitive claims, on the other hand force you to define in precise terms how you are unique among your competitors. Through the use of The only Statement a detailed assessment of the competition is done and is correlated with the critical desires of the customer groups you have chosen to serve. And, included in the analysis mix is the competencies and skills of the organization. ‘Telecom Company X has the only network that ....’ is the claim that we need to aspire to.
It informs the organization what specifically it want to do that is unique it tells the customer what specific value and benefits will be delivered to them and it provides a framework for measuring and proving the claim.
Winning is not about comparative and superlative claims in any event. They are not needed. You don’t have to be better than another company or best among your competitors to succeed and survive. You need to BE DiFFERENT.
Provide relevant, compelling and UNIQUE value to those you have chosen to serve and the spoils of the battle will flow your way.
Cheers, Roy
Remember to follow me on Twitter
Take the BE DiFFERENT Quiz
Related Blog Articles
The Only Statement
Avoid Aspirational Claims
Posted 3.29.10 at 08:27 am by Roy Osing | Permalink | Comments (0)
March 26, 2010
Is a Competitive Edge Good Enough?
Words describe strategic intent and I have a real problem applying ‘soft’ or ‘incremental’ words to the critical business function of sustainable differentiation and survival.
Competitive edge means to me that your intent is to be slightly better than your competition. Is that what we really intend? I hope not! A ‘slightly better’ strategy leads to things like:
- more price promotions.
- PR campaigns based on a lofty vision.
- products that break down less frequently.
- the sporadic introduction of customer appreciation days.
- ‘smile’ training for service employees.
- technology adoption based on its availability from suppliers.
- aspirational claims in the market like ‘the best network’, or highest quality services.
The driver of a ‘slightly better’ strategy is what the competition is doing, and you spend all of your time looking to ‘one-up’ them. You are constantly in a reaction mode with no long term strategy and everything gets done incrementally. In addition, predicating your strategy on the actions of the competition to the exclusion of your customers is survival limiting at best. Your organization WILL die, the only question is when.
Lets start to use words that compel us to do something truly great for our organization; success and survival demand us to do so. Here are some words that I think provide the right BE DiFFERENT motivation to create a strategy that will assure long terms success:
- dominate the competition
- prevail over them
- cripple their efforts
A strategy with these types of words as its mentor will result in:
- a unique product that can knock down a fire in 30 seconds.
- a child’s plush toy extended to include an Internet experience.
- a woman’s wedding and graduation shoe supplier that includes dancing lessons with each purchase.
- a jeweller who loans a diamond ring to a valued and trusted customer.
- a smartpone supplier that mass-customizes applications to meet the divergent needs of its customer base.
- a marina in the San Juan Islands that creates such a consistent DiFFERENT boating experience for mariners, they keep coming back for more.
Competitve edge? NO! Dominate and Cripple will get your the strategy you need to survive in these harsh times. The road-kill of those that didn’t think this way are unfortunately too numerous to mention.
Cheers, Roy
Remember to follow me on Twitter
Take the BE DiFFERENT Quiz
Related Blog Articles
Avoid Aspirational Claims
The Only Statement
Strategy Roadmap
Strategy doesn’t have to be Painful
Strategic Game Plan
BE DiFFERENT Lady Gaga
Strategy Creation Process
Posted 3.26.10 at 07:07 am by Roy Osing | Permalink | Comments (1)
March 23, 2010
BE DiFFERENT Strategy Roadmap
In Chapter Twenty of my new book BE DiFFERENT or be dead: Your Business Survival Guide, I outline critical Practices to ensure the strategy for your organization is effectively executed.
BD Practice #1 - Over-communicate your strategy to everyone in your organization. The overall strategy for the organization must be well understood by every person in it. If people don’t completely understand the direction - and how it is different from the present course - how will they know what to do to bring the strategy to life? Spend copious amounts of time communicating the strategy throughout your organization; and do it face-to-face to allow for questions of clarification. One-way ‘conversations’ won’t work.
BD Practice #2 - Translate the strategy into what it means for every function, department and business unit in the organization. For example, what does it require sales to do? Marketing? Customer Service? Operations? Every operating entity needs to know precisely what it needs to do day-in and day-out to make the strategy come alive. This direct Line of Sight from an operating unit, for example, to the business strategy will avoid the common dilemma of different directions being taken because different interpretations of the strategy have been made.
Last Point: Ensure the leader(s) of the organization see how each department interprets the organization’s strategy and that they approve them. This is the only way to ensure that the strategic intent gets driven through the company consistently. Failure to do this will typically result in Strategic Dysfunction: a variety of interpretations of the strategy and actions that diverge from the intended strategic results.
BD Practice #3 - Rationalize the portfolio of action plans and tactics into the high priority ones that will drive 80% of the results expected. This is a difficult task as it requires an intimate understanding of your strategy and what it takes to deliver results with a minimum amount of resource commitment.
BD Practice #4 - Establish a learning feedback loop on how implementation is going and whether the results gained were consistent with what was expected. Every unit in your organization must participate in order to Plan on the Run.
BD Practice #5 - Create a process to integrate your execution learnings into adjustments to your strategy. Execute >> Learn >> Adjust >> Execute >> Learn >> Adjust >>
Cheers, Roy
Remember to follow me on Twitter
Take the BE DiFFERENT Quiz
Related Blog Articles
Be Anal about Execution
Plan on the Run
Line of Sight Execution
Posted 3.23.10 at 07:48 am by Roy Osing | Permalink | Comments (0)
March 20, 2010
A, B, C’s of Execution
The anchor of any execution plan is your organization’s strategy; it informs and drives every tactic and activity that people are engaged in. I see too many organizations executing a number of tactics with no strategic plan or context to give them meaning.
So, before describing what ‘good’ execution looks like, make sure you have a strategy to lean on. If not, go back to square one and create one. In addition, when creating your strategy, spend significant time on thinking through implementation. Avoid the trap of spending 80% of your time on the essence of your strategy and 20% on execution. Reverse your focus and spend 80% of your time on executional planning.
The A, B, C’s of BE DiFFERENT Execution:
A. Get your strategy in focus. In addition to simply having a strategy as mentioned above, your strategy needs to be specific and clear to drive the specific top priority executional elements throughout your organization. Aspirations will kill implementation. A vague strategy results in a diffusion of executional energy and lack of results. The BE DiFFERENT Strategic Game Plan will serve the purpose very well. Use it.
B. Define the top three things that will drive 80% of your Strategic Game Plan. An intimate understanding of your strategy is required. Its not a matter of having a relevant Action Plan list of twenty things to work on. You need to purge the relevant but less compelling actions; focus on the critical few only.
C. Get every function - marketing, sales service, operations etc. - in the organization to determine the critical three things THEY must do to achieve the top 3 organizational priorities. Make this task non-negotiable. If every department in your organization doesn’t have direct line of sight to your overall strategy, people will tend to march to their own drummer and effective execution doesn’t happen.
D. Take point ‘C’ further and build departmental priorities into everyone’s Personal Performance and Compensation Plan. Make it real tough for any individual in the organization to deviate from the strategic imperatives of the firm. Pay people ONLY when they further the Strategic Game Plan. This motivation will create behavioral synergy and progress.
E. Cut the Crap. Eliminate non-strategic tactics and activity and make room for the things that need to be executed in the Strategic Game Plan. Execution around the new strategy gets impaired when people continue to do the old comfortable stuff. Assign a Cut the Crap champion to make this happen.
F. Pan on the Run. Learn from how you are implementing your strategy and tweak your execution plan as you go. Execute > Learn > Adjust > Execute >....
Cheers, Roy
Remember to follow me on Twitter
Take the BE DiFFERENT Quiz
Related Blogs
Creating your Strategy doesn’t have to be Painful
Antipate well; React Brilliantly!
Be Anal about Execution
Roy’s Rule of Three
Strategy Hawk
Plan on the Run
Cut the Crap
Line of Sight Execution
Avoid Aspirational Intent
Posted 3.20.10 at 08:00 am by Roy Osing | Permalink | Comments (0)

